#DEFECT PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM HOW TO#

Both new and experienced quality practitioners should be trained in the PFMEA tools. This course is designed for quality professionals in the aerospace engine manufacturing sector who seek compliance with AS13100 requirements in defect prevention specific to customer escapes. Provide the necessary skills and insight to effectively deploy RM13004 in any business.Create Reference Process FMEAs for future use in creating Part Specific PFMEAs.

#DEFECT PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM HOW TO#

Learn how to develop a Control Plan from the Process FMEA information.Identify appropriate risk mitigation improvement actions.

Assess Process Risks and prioritize actions.

Lead the development of a Process FMEA on a manufacturing / assembly process.

Complete a Process Flow Diagram (PFD) in line with AS13100 and RM13004 requirements.

Evaluate and contribute to the Design FMEA activity.

Show the links to other Defect Prevention Tools such as APQP, Measurement Systems Analysis and PPAP.

Explain the role of FMEA, PFDs, and Control Plans as part of a Defect Prevention System.

Learning Objectivesīy attending this seminar, you will be able to: It will also describe the use of Reference Process FMEAs that can be used to minimize the duplication and reduce the time taken to produce an effective PFMEA whilst maintaining the required rigor. The course will include hands on examples of FMEA deployment in a variety of typical manufacturing environments (including processing, machining and assembly) to illustrate how the technique is to be deployed. It will show the links to other quality tools such as Characteristics Matrix and Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA). This two-day course is designed to explain the core tools of Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (DFMEA), Process Flow Diagrams, Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) and Control Plans as described in AS13100 and RM13004. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) and Control Plan activities are recognized as being one of the most effective, on the journey to Zero Defects.

When the group runs out of ideas, focus attention on areas in the chart where ideas are thin.In the Aerospace Industry there is a focus on Defect Prevention to ensure that quality goals are met.

Layers of branches indicate causal relationships. Continue to ask “Why?” and generate deeper levels of causes. Write sub–causes branching off the causes.

Ask the question “why does this happen?” again.

Causes can be written in several places, if they relate to several categories. Ask: “Why does this happen?” As each idea is given, the facilitator writes it as a branch from the appropriate category.

Write the categories of causes as branches from the main arrow.

For instance, it might make sense to start with these generic headings: methods, machines (equipment), people (manpower), materials, measurement, and environment.

Brainstorm the primary categories of causes for the problem.

Write the problem statement at the center-right of the flipchart or whiteboard, box it, and draw a horizontal arrow running to it.

The group should agree on a problem statement (effect).

The purpose of the Ishikawa diagram is to allow management to determine which issues have to be addressed in order to gain or avoid a particular event. They are causal diagrams created by Kaoru Ishikawa to show the causes of a specific event. They resemble a fish skeleton, with the 'ribs' representing the causes of an event and the final outcome appearing at the head of the skeleton. Ishikawa diagrams are sometimes referred to as fish bone diagrams, herringbone diagrams, cause-and-effect diagrams, or Fishikawa.

Ishikawa diagrams often follow the 'Six M's': manpower, machinery, methods, materials, measurement, and mother nature.

Shaped somewhat like a fish, these charts are sometimes called fishbone or 'Fishikawa' diagrams.

They are named after Japanese engineering professor Kaoru Ishikawa in the 1960s, who helped apply them to manufacturing processes.

An Ishikawa diagram is used to show the causal factors that go into some final outcome, often related to a production or design problem.

Defect process flow diagram